have sb doing sth

to prefer doing sth [to doing sth] etw lieber [als etw] tun. that's all your doing daran bist allein du schuld. I loathe doing housework. Hausarbeit ist mir zuwider. to be doing nicely (health-wise) wohlauf sein. your hair wants doing. du solltest mal wieder zum Friseur gehen. Daha fazla göster. to be sb's doing jds Werk sein. have sb/sth doing 使/让做某事 Her stepmother had her washing without a rest yesterday afternoon. The farmers have the trators working all day and all night. 揪错 ┆ 评论 ┆ 举报: 提问者对答案的评价： 哦 emmener qn. à sth. to take sb. to sth. sci. Royal Society of {noun} Royal Society of [Br.] cuis. se refaire une tasse de thé: to make another cup of tea: cuis. tremper son biscuit dans son thé: to dunk one's biscuit in one's tea [Br.] cuis. se préparer une tasse de thé: to make oneself a cup of tea: tremper son biscuit dans son thé to be thankful to sb for doing sth exp. jdm dankbar sein, dass er/sie etw getan hat. Entrada relacionada com: thankful. Comentários adicionais: Para assegurar a qualidade dos comentários, deve-se identificar. have sb.do sth.have sb./sth.doing sth.和 have sth.done 这三个句型在英语中经常会出现,如果不注意它们的区别就很容易造成理解上的困难,下面我们具体谈谈它们的意义. Site De Rencontre Americain Sans Inscription. To have somebody do something = to get somebody to do something; a one-off action, something that’s not supposed to take very long. To have somebody doing something = to cause someone to be occupied in doing something, usually a continuous activity; something that is going to be a long process. Jane had Frank book her tickets for the show. Jane got Frank to book her tickets for the show. He had the gardener take care of his lawn. I’ll have another gardener looking after these camellia bushes that are planted in the flower bed by the front porch. The management will have another coach working work with the team in the next session. Both expressions may sound similar, but to have someone do something is more appropriate for somebody giving orders, though to have someone doing something can also have this sense He had me letting let out small snores when mother came into the room. Cousin Tom had me ignoring Sarah and Nancy all through these days. We also have the construction to have + something object + done past participle by somebody to express the same Jane had her tickets booked by the agent. Jane got the agent to book her tickets. Notice that the agent by somebody’ is often omitted Did you have your car wash by the attendant? Did you get your car wash by the attendant? Some more examples They should have someone check it out for them. She can’t believe he did this to her! He had her doubt her fashion sense! Mrs Joseph will have miss Sharon explain the midpoint formula to her niece. a one-off action, something that’s going to take little time. Mrs Joseph will have miss Sharon teaching her niece. a more continuous action Some grammar experts say the second structure is not acceptable and even ungrammatical and the first one is correct. Anyway, both constructions are in use. Only problem with the second is that it is somewhat ambiguous and we should stick to the first one. Some more examples She has the maid clean the house. the maid cleans the house regularly for her She will have the maid cleaning the house. the maid will clean the house in near future She is having the maid clean the house. the maid will clean the house in near future He is going to have the actors of the movie photograph with us after the shooting. Don’t be stupid! I’m not going to have anybody laugh at you. She was a couple of hours late. It had me wondering if there was something wrong. have somebody do something có nghĩa là ra lệnh cho ai làm một việc gì đó. Ví dụ ○ Have him come here at five. = Hãy nói anh ấy đến đây lúc năm giờ. ○ He had the barber cut his hair short. = Anh ấy yêu cầu người thợ cắt tóc cắt tóc anh ấy ngắn lại. ○ I’ll have the porter bring your luggage up right away. = Tôi sẽ cho người khuân vác mang hành lý của bạn lên ngay. have somebody doing something có những nghĩa sau 1. Bị ảnh hưởng bởi hành động của ai đó không yêu cầu, ra lệnh cho họ. Ví dụ ○ We have many people begging in the streets. = Chúng ta có nhiều người ăn xin ngoài đường. ○ He usually has his colleagues talking bad about him. = Anh ấy thường bị đồng nghiệp nói xấu về mình. ○ He forgot to buy the toys and had his children complaining. = Anh ấy quên mua đồ chơi và bị con mình than trách. 2. Khiến người khác làm gì đó một cách gián tiếp không yêu cầu, ra lệnh cho họ. Ví dụ ○ The film had us crying. = Bộ phim làm cho chúng tôi khóc. ○ The teacher had the students listening attentively. = Người giáo viên làm cho học sinh nghe giảng một cách chăm chú. giáo viên không bắt học sinh phải nghe chăm chú nhưng vì giảng bài hay nên đã gián tiếp làm cho học sinh nghe chăm chú ○ Within minutes the comedian had the whole audience laughing. = Trong vòng vài phút người nghệ sĩ hài đã làm cho toàn bộ khán giả bật cười. nghệ sĩ hài không ra lệnh cho khán giả cười nhưng đã nói điều gì đó mắc cười, gián tiếp làm cho họ cười 3. Cho phép ai đó làm gì đó. Nghĩa này thường dùng trong câu phủ định. Ví dụ ○ We can’t have people arriving late all the time. = Chúng ta không thể cho phép mọi người đi trễ mãi được. 4. Yêu cầu ai đó làm việc. Nghĩa này khá giống với have somebody do something. Điểm khác biệt là have somebody doing something dùng khi yêu cầu người ta làm việc lâu dài và làm nhiều lần. Còn have somebody do something thường dùng khi yêu cầu người ta làm một việc một lần ở một thời điểm nào đó thôi. Ví dụ ○ Mr Smith had had us all working so hard. = Ông Smith đã bắt chúng tôi làm việc quá cực nhọc. ○ My boss has me doing all kinds of jobs for her. = Bà chủ của tôi bắt tôi làm mọi loại công việc cho bà ấy. New! JOIN Forums Grammar Vocabulary Pronunciation Listening Speaking Reading Writing Guestbook 7 Secrets About More... Moderator Alan MARYAM Member Posts 16 Joined Thu Jul 02, 2015 506 pm Status Learner of English with sb doing sth gaining knowledge may be facilitated through such methods as reding ,listening,or actively participating - with most people having a distinct preference for one method over the other in the above sentence what is the role of "with"? 2-if we have a non defining clause that begins with preposition "with" 3-of course,i know the stucture "with sb/sth doing sth" please explain the meaning of undelined part Alan Teacher/Moderator Posts 14884 Joined Mon Dec 29, 2003 756 pm Status Teacher of English Location Japan Re with sb doing sth Post by Alan » Sat Aug 08, 2015 519 am 1. 'With' here, as always, is a preposition. 2. No. 'With...other' is simply a prepositional adverbial supplying additional information. 3. = most people referred to in the foregoing section have... I see my understanding of the question was wrong. My apologies. I should have asked for clarification before writing my first answer. I will leave it standing for now because I think it is relevant, at least in part. You want to double-check your understanding of "want somebody doing something" with regards to the word "want." You have questions about the following sentence because it uses the word differently than you think it should "I don't want anybody in the class talking during the test." That sentence is perfectly correct. I know because my teachers said it-or similar statements-many a time. Admittedly, I never knew there were any rules about how to use the word "want"; one just uses it without thinking. But I am looking through your basic rules to see which fits best and why. Want meaning wish’ or desire' Given the sentence structure, it seems the most appropriate rule is "Want meaning wish’ or desire'." The following sentence is perhaps the closest fit to use for an example She said I could have her old bike, but I don’t want it. The important part of this sentence is I don't want __. What don't "I" want? Answer "it," meaning "her old bike." The teacher in your sentence is also saying "I don't want _____________________." What don't "I" want? Answer anyone in class talking during the test. This differs with my first answer where I agreed that "want" means "need." In that answer, I focused on the actual meaning of the word. Now I am focusing on the grammar rules, which is what you have been doing all along. Want meaning need’ Here is the grammar rule re need Want meaning need’ Two examples they provide are Your hair wants cutting. needs to be cut That cupboard wants clearing out. In my part of the world, we don't say it like that; we say, "It's time to cut your hair," or "Your hair needs a trim." Likewise with the cupboard "It's time to clear out that cupboard." "That cupboard needs to be cleared out" For the teacher to use "want" that way, the sentence would say something like this "This class wants no one talking during the test." Saying it that way, the teacher would risk the students disagreeing, or finding it silly, in the same way as with the statement in my first answer, "I don't need anyone in the class talking during the test." To do, or doing Back to "want somebody doing something." Just now I reread that post. The answer says it doesn't really matter which one one uses to do, or doing. I agree. What matters is the sentence one is saying, the context of the situation, and whom one is talking to. It also matters what it is one is asking for. I think this applies to all cultures and all languages A parent or teacher can use different language or terminology to demand or request something from children than children can use to ask for something from their teachers or parents. In other words, superiors have the power to withhold privileges and subordinates must be humble if they want their wishes granted. Thus, "I want" may have to be expressed somewhat differently depending who is saying it to whom. Maybe this is off-topic. Back on topic. If it does not matter whether we say "to do" or "doing," is there a difference in meaning between does it matter which I say "I don't want anybody in the class to talk during the test." and "I don't want anybody in the class talking during the test." Both are grammatically correct. The first one might imply that students are not allowed to raise their hands to ask a question, while the second one might impart the message that students should not chatter among themselves. However, I can't be sure of this. A lot depends on the communication patterns of teacher and students, the general culture of that specific classroom, and how people in that geographical location generally speak. Language is not set in stone. I say give it a try and see if it works. To have somebody do something most commonly means to cause somebody to do something eg, ask, force, pay. But in this sentence the verb had means something like believed, perceived, recorded, claimed, or stated. The clerk said the robber was tall and blond, but another witness had the robber as being of average height with red hair. The history that the victors created claimed that the capitalists were the winners. More simply The victors claimed that the capitalists were the winners. The rhetorical style suggests that the writer may be expressing disagreement with or doubt about that claim. There are many reasons for chosing an -ing form over another type of word, sometimes more than one reason in a particular instance. Here, the primary purpose was to avoid the phrase to have somebody win, which suggests that have means cause. We would need more context to figure out if the -ing form is also related to a time aspect. I would guess not, as it probably functions here as a verbal noun instead of a present participle.

have sb doing sth